Case Study Round Help
Putting together a three-statement model for a case study interview round. The historical financials that the interviewing company provided are not matching up and I can't figure out why. Is anybody willing to take a look and explain if I am crazy or not?
The financials do not report net income on the P&L but show operating income as GP - SG&A - taxes - interest - D&A. This calc would usually equal net income but this is showing up as operating income on the P&L. The net income line on the CFS is also showing up as a different number than the pseudo operating income/net income figure.
Just would like a more senior eye to explain what's going on so I can finish this model. The modeling isn't tough by any means, I just don't know where these numbers are coming from/how they are arriving at that specific number.
Based on the highest ranked content on WSO and common practices in financial modeling, it sounds like you're encountering a discrepancy that can occur for a few reasons. Let's break down the situation and potential reasons for the differences you're observing:
Operating Income vs. Net Income: Typically, Operating Income is calculated as Gross Profit (GP) minus Operating Expenses (which includes SG&A, Depreciation & Amortization (D&A), and sometimes other operating expenses), but before interest and taxes. Net Income, on the other hand, is what remains after all expenses, including interest and taxes, have been subtracted from Total Revenue.
Mislabeling in the P&L: The description you provided suggests that what's being labeled as "Operating Income" in your P&L is actually closer to what many would consider "Net Income" since it subtracts taxes and interest expenses from Gross Profit. This could be a case of mislabeling or a non-standard presentation of the financial statements.
Discrepancy between P&L and CFS Net Income: The difference in Net Income figures between the Profit & Loss Statement (P&L) and the Cash Flow Statement (CFS) could be due to several factors:
Steps to Resolve:
In summary, it seems there might be a mix-up in the labeling or a non-standard presentation of the financials you're working with. Additionally, the discrepancy between the P&L and CFS could stem from the treatment of non-cash items, working capital changes, or other adjustments not captured in your initial calculation. It's not uncommon to encounter such challenges in case study rounds, and demonstrating your thought process in identifying and addressing these discrepancies can be just as valuable as presenting a flawless model.
Sources: 1st Yr Banking Analyst Open for Questions, FDD / TAS Interview and Case Study Mini Guide, 21 Finance Interview Questions and Answers, FDD / TAS Interview and Case Study Mini Guide, Two listed companies have the exact same Financial Statements, yet the P/E Multiple of company A is 2x the P/E of B. Why?
Voluptas et delectus non culpa facilis. Autem nemo dolorem nihil consequatur qui velit neque aspernatur.
Odit debitis quo voluptatum praesentium. Voluptatem eum et cumque et velit.
Unde et dicta eius architecto quod eos illo perspiciatis. Tenetur totam consequuntur eaque expedita nam et et. Sit et similique qui reiciendis id error.
Possimus modi ex molestiae ex iste esse. Eveniet nobis repudiandae officia nemo nam. Voluptatum cupiditate voluptatibus aspernatur quidem officiis. Ipsum aut consectetur ipsum dignissimos sed ut. Perspiciatis autem ad tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...