We are going through a business review that involves selling off a lot of the company. Alternative energy is… part of it but, at least for the M&A team, Dominion’s clean energy goals are really only a “what deal to do” question not a “why we are so busy” one.

Like we signed a $14b deal to sell our gas pipelines recently. We sold our remaining stake in an LNG facility for $3.3b. It is very clear why we chose to do these specific deals both in terms of why we need to sell anything and why these assets in particular

 

Probably not a good idea to give away so much info about yourself. Also, lemme guess JL are your initials. Smh

 

(1) Maybe if I was going to say something stupid that would be an issue.

(2) You know pretty much no one is anonymous on this site, right? Even if you “anonymize” the way you talk about your experience and the like, it doesn’t take much to figure it out. You basically have to say nothing of substance as a relatively new user in order to have any real anonyminity here

 

Yeah. I don’t hide who I am. I have talked about my past in ways that make it blindingly obvious who I am. 

Granted, very few people are truly anonymous on here. You can connect the dots and figure out who the user is for most people on this site. Unless you just don’t make any meaningful comments and are relatively new, you’re not really anonymous. 

 

MM PE,

Partners say this is the worst they’ve seen since 2008. Anything that does seem interesting has an absurd multiple attached to it.

 

PF is on fire, seems like everyone is short staffed across the board

 
Most Helpful

Pe is phucked in my opinion.  Too many firms. Too many bad portcos.  Gonna be hard to flip these.  The music has stopped playing.

PE was never really that big during higher rate environments in the 80s.   I don't see lower rate environment for at least 5 to 8 years.   

Less sponsor deals means less m&a advisory. 

 

Pe is phucked in my opinion.  Too many firms. Too many bad portcos.  Gonna be hard to flip these.  The music has stopped playing.

PE was never really that big during higher rate environments in the 80s.   I don't see lower rate environment for at least 5 to 8 years.   

Less sponsor deals means less m&a advisory. 

No more bundling a bunch of turds together and marketing them as a BEAUTIFUL AND AMAZING PLATFORM

 
acardboardmonkey

Agreed - but I think LMM PE will continue to have strong returns

In my space, consumer, there are a ton of dogshit LMM funds run by luckier than smart boomer types that are getting destroyed right now because they never really understood how a modern LMM consumer brand scales. They keep trying to run boomer playbooks, which are much harder when ZIRPdaddy is gone.

 

Just had an "interview" with a smaller IB and was very skeptical as I just did a Google search and the first thing that popped up was that they lost a lot of money for some of their clients. Just hesitant because of what I found on Google. I won’t name drop the company but they are smaller company and they are brokers. I would like any tips and advice on how to go about this if I move on to the second round. Thanks!

 

In the industry, people appreciate honesty (at least I would and I met people who did too). You should be upfront and ask that at the end of your interview when they offer you to ask questions. Not in a disrespectful way, but they will be the best placed to address that. For example, you can ask "what is the vision for the next years, how do you think to get back on xx given I saw you lost deal/client xyz, which is understandable given the current market environment. Then, just try to read through the bullshit of the question :)  I'm sure they will prefer to see someone who is well aware and know how to do proper DD than a clueless guy. Then, hopefully you get an offer at the end, and you can decide / use it as a leverage to get into other processes / get offers.  Just push all the levers here, it's worth it anyway. Good luck 

 

Interesting thoughts above.

What I see in private markets is a general gap between valuations expectations and current valuations buyers are ready to pay for in this current macro environment. We see a lot of process starting as "market soundings" and then getting pulled out because of this gap. PE-owned assets and other private assets will still need a bit more time to readjust their expectations and accept the lower multiples (we have been seeing that for a while, and start to see a beginning of a shift). Also, IPOs getting pulled out, same reasons. Many funds will have to sell at some point so it will unlock eventually.

What doesn't help is the high interests rates and high inflation who are here to stay: this distorts the traditional returns you would have been able to do over the last decades, and this will indeed move away LPs capital allocation from PE to other asset class, in particular credit, resulting again in less M&A.

I'm still super hopeful for the near future and don't think this is structural, there might be less deals than 2021 on a long-term basis, but still many ways to get creative, people will still continue to create value, high-quality or heavy-operational improvements or high growth assets will for sure continue to present themselves and there will be a market for this! Obviously, hugely sector dependant and geography dependant .

 

We (large public IT Services / Consulting firm) have seen a whole bunch of deals being soft-marketed or fully-marketed to us in the past year but most stink. A ton of PE shops trying to offload their less successful acquisitions without having to take a write-down. Funny but apparently a good amount have come in the form of soft-sells directly from MM sponsors. Sort of a "Hey, we're totally not trying to sell this asset because it's totally not underperforming our expectations and all but uhhhhhh if you would entertain 17.5x EBITDA on a negative growth Cloud Migration Consulting rollup platform that we never actually integrated, we'd be super interested". 

I just started but allegedly our Strategic Finance arm has seen a good bit of that recently.

 

Hmm 17.5x for Cloud Migration?
Have worked enough in this space to tell you that’s not too bad as long as the EV is about c.500mm

Logicworks got sold not too long ago and that was a turd

IT services players have huge cash balance, it’s a terrible year for growth so one of the laggards might be tempted to put in a bid as the year winds down

What do you think?

 

most of my deals are quiet for the last few weeks but expect to really kick of early next year

yeah nah. most companies locked in low rates for >5 years during COVID. the maturity wall has to hit before things start moving again. barring an economic miracle this slump is going to last a while.

 

Another dynamic I am seeing is demand for quality assets and nervousness around PE firms not deploying capital. It seems like in order to win a bid for a quality company, you still need to pay an absurd amount because funds know they need to do something and there aren’t enough quality companies to go around. Curious if anyone else is seeing this.

 

Absolutely, also heard about instances of funds in a fundraising mode who desperately try to sign a deal to have a nice story to tell to LPs to support the Investor Relations efforts. And so in these instances they were ready to pay the price for it. I agree this would help to relaunch the market too. This slow deployment pace can't last forever, they need to return money to investors.

 

A lot of processes ongoing, some very large. We are getting crushed.

With that being said, you can really tell people are anxious and the success-rate has gone down a lot, I’ve had 3 deals fall apart 1-2 days before signing date this year because of the market sentiment etc.

 

I’ve been mostly on live stuff all year and my group beat its budget for the year already, hoping bonus is good but I’m scared it’ll be dragged by non-performing groups

 

PCA here - work is popping off, and deals are up. Imo PCA is one of the few divisions that hasn’t seem deal volume decrease but actually actively on the rise. Cross my fingers for my M&A and RX brothers out there.

 

Private Capital Advisory, aka working on secondaries advisory. Its one of the few segments in the IB industry which is actively growing quickly, and grows in both deal count and volume, on both the buyside and sellside.

 

I think it's pretty bad right now due to the uncertainty and mismatch in expectations. The uncertainty is quite high as people still don't really know what will happen with interest rates / inflation / the economy. Interest rates seem quite stable at the moment, but it appears that they will stay high for much longer than initially expected and if inflation doesn't continue to come down the rates would get even worse. As no one knows whether interest rates will decrease sharply next year, remain flat at high levels for a long period of time, or increase even more, pricing assets is not as easy as it used to be in a very predictable environment where rates remained somewhat flat at low levels. This is especially the case if you also consider that there is great uncertainty regarding economic and geopolitical developments. 

I also think that there is a mismatch in terms of expectations. A seller will still look back to valuations seen in 2021 / early 2022 while buyers will have a much more conservative valuation to account for higher rates and uncertainty. There is also the question of returns. I think many PE firms see that selling at current prices would significantly impact their returns. As a result, they decide to keep the hope alive by delaying exits, hoping that valuations will "normalize" soon. This results in a negative cycle. Fewer exits of course impact deal activity directly, but also indirectly. As fewer PE firms exit their investments, distributions to LPs decrease, leading to LPs not being able to invest as much in new funds, which again decreases deal activity for PE

Over the last decade, we have seen PE flourishing. Cheap capital and expanding multiples. Pretty much every PE firm has been able to aggressively grow fund size and deliver attractive returns. As capital becomes more restricted, only the strong performers will be able to continue growing / maintaining fund size. Moreover, as the trend of constantly expanding multiples disappears, it will become clear which PE firms can actually deliver returns to their investors. It will become clear which PE firms can efficiently source, transform, and improve assets. It will also become clear which PE firms were just riding the wave of expanding multiples but really don't have much value to add. 

 

In PE - quite busy actually, looking at a lot of take-private opportunities with some late-stage deals personally and some announced by my team this year.

As other commenters put above, this will be an interesting time for PE - the next 3-5 years will show which PE firms were truly disciplined and value-add in their investments (or lucky) and which ones just rode the bull market / tech market and got away for overpaying for assets in an easy money era

 

My MM ADG group is still doing well. A slight decrease in deal flow, but definitely a decrease in prices buyers are willing to pay.

 

(LMM IB) Definitely fluctuating a lot between extremely busy and have fuck all to do. Nov 22-March was extremely slow, probably hit an avg of 25-30 hours a week over the course of those months. Right now on 4 live sell sides (all from the last 2 months), getting ready to roll out to market next week.

 

Anyone busy right now is prepping sellsides "getting ready to hit the market"

Come back in 3 to 6 months when you have 1 to 2 bids that deeply offend the sellers.  Trust me...I've seen these CIMs in process right now....the projections and ebitda adjustments are quite...."optimistic" to say the least.

Just because you are busy on a live sellside doesn't mean your bank has great deal flow. Need to close these chit sellsides first.

 

12 IOIs on last industrials based company, 7 are good. I don’t know what to tell u man. Deal flow not great industry wide, but it’s starting to pick up at my firm.

 

I can think of like ~5 recent sell side mandates that are going absolutely nowhere. Maybe in ‘21 someone would take a chance at these valuations but no shot now.

Im really not sure I see an end to this in the near to medium term. Remember “post Labor Day?” Now it’s ‘24 which happens to be an election year, large scale wars and MAYBE slight rate cuts. Recipe for success! All sponsors will need is 50bps less on their TLBs to get rolling again 🤗

 

in TMT at a BB.  

M&A: Mid-caps that were thinking about selling during pandemic highs are now going to market given that 52w average has rerated.  ~80% of juniors in my group are staffed on live sell / buy side mandates. Meaningful uptick in activity since labor day.    

Debt: Dead, except for some amends/extends.

Equity: IPOs starting to come back. A lot of the menial pitch work in the last 12m has been around 'preparing' / benchmarking the IPO pipeline for when IPO market reopens....some recent tech IPO activity is giving our clients more confidence to go to market in the next two quarters. Not a lot of actual mandates yet so could be smoke blown from clients but they seem serious about it.    

 

College junior now, already signed for SA24- thoughts on if deal flow will return to a more normal frequency by the time I would potentially hit the desk? (Fall 2025) Or is it too far out to guess?

 

Nulla enim illum praesentium qui. Perspiciatis sint illo nesciunt quam sed. Quos in et rerum sit temporibus unde nobis. Voluptatum ea blanditiis qui et maiores.

Incidunt illum accusamus ullam aut. Minus perferendis rerum repellendus quaerat assumenda aut. Nulla omnis atque rerum enim perspiciatis debitis.

Porro nihil officia voluptates quisquam. Quibusdam omnis minima magni eligendi excepturi mollitia mollitia. Aut voluptas quis ducimus dolore velit ratione. Et temporibus officia earum magnam rerum sit.

Sed aut consectetur voluptas minus dicta optio culpa. Adipisci hic illum nam iure. Voluptas corrupti fuga eveniet. Rerum repellat doloremque sint cum. Beatae est aperiam ut amet tenetur error commodi. Qui ullam similique tempore omnis eos quia quidem est. Animi quae quis harum delectus. Nihil iste non hic nobis quis sint modi.

 

Omnis ex voluptate minus adipisci. Alias delectus vel consequatur sit.

Consequuntur assumenda minima officiis perspiciatis. Molestiae modi illum ut quae non a.

Voluptate omnis qui nisi placeat exercitationem dolores. Officia in iusto ut. Dicta ut repellendus dolorem eos vel numquam maxime. At necessitatibus harum aut veritatis et eaque.

Placeat occaecati id illo non in voluptatem in velit. Voluptatum dignissimos nihil alias ea. Vel id magnam molestias sit. Vel doloremque in natus numquam blanditiis. Magnam occaecati sit repellendus aut officia.

 

Voluptates perferendis quae tempore id aspernatur. Qui corporis qui sed voluptatibus et est aut.

Esse cupiditate sunt molestiae possimus saepe reiciendis. Qui itaque harum quibusdam officiis nam maiores quo asperiores. Velit et eligendi tempora excepturi sed. Ut quas in explicabo eius inventore exercitationem id. Sed dignissimos aut quia rerum quam. Est necessitatibus sed omnis aliquid excepturi necessitatibus. Et commodi praesentium labore praesentium quam quis iure ipsum.

Illum deserunt suscipit voluptatem dolore nisi. Maxime quasi ducimus quisquam necessitatibus sint atque asperiores. Eos dolor nostrum dolores fugit ea. Dicta totam id voluptatibus quos perspiciatis commodi.

Distinctio adipisci eaque odit et doloremque. Facere nobis est quas doloribus dolorem et. Qui veritatis et asperiores odio. A distinctio minima iure et quia. Reprehenderit alias rerum est veniam ut aut consectetur. Nisi quis molestias at at quia repudiandae provident. Voluptate placeat nulla quidem pariatur aliquid quos quos doloremque.

 

Et earum error laudantium minus vitae aperiam quia. Omnis voluptate alias tenetur sunt. Vitae maiores consequatur autem repellat. Vitae est tempore voluptas.

Molestiae ut tempora quia eos aliquam error cum. Animi delectus culpa amet ex. Maiores a quia facilis rerum mollitia veritatis perspiciatis. Saepe saepe vero odio enim quod voluptate.

Et qui eaque qui aspernatur voluptate ratione. Voluptate sapiente sunt recusandae enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”