What was IB like in the 80s/90s for analysts and associates?

Just curious to know how different the day to day was for the entry level people and 1-3 years.
Did they have similar responsibilities? Work more or less hours? Was it more or less of a grind?
I know the culture was wilder and pay seemed to be much better but there doesn’t seem to be too much info about what the current leaders and rainmakers did in their early years.
I’ve asked a few older people and they usually just harp on how fun it was or make it seem like despite better pay they were working 140 hour weeks nonstop (I think they’re full of shit). Can anyone provide unbiased context on this?

 

I think things were hand drawn and there were a few programs before excel too. But before regulations dropped later in the 80s and early 90s a lot of functions had to be outsourced.

I also never worked in banking but I talk to a few senior bankers and have many friends in it. I’m just curious if younger guys are being spun a false narrative about how hard or not hard they’re working.

As a dude in sales I can say when I started a lot of the old heads were and are still very out of touch especially for when it comes to cold calls…everyone should start out or experience it but your “tested method” that younger people coming up don’t feel like doing isnt because theyre pussies…it’s because it’s not remotely as effective. Still useful but only the smarter leaders now are aware of that.

 

If they didn’t have computers or email, how did analysts get comments? Did your associate just scream changes for you to make in the bullpen?
 

What about after 7pm where senior people went home, would you just show the next iteration the next morning? 

 
Most Helpful

While there is merit in discussing excel (back in the day most banks had one central computer at most, with calculations done manually and reviewed by multiple people of varying seniority), the biggest difference was research.

Whereas now you can just google away, back in the day a lot of your time was spent physically researching the bank in a library that probably had copies of newspapers and general books on industries. Perhaps what will take an analyst now a couple hours took a few days back in the day.

Also most teams where super lean, with less than 20 individuals per team and perhaps a few MDs specialized in a vertical (you used to be generalist). Many banks did not see much business in M&A and preferred underwriting instead. It was guys like Rob Greenhill from Morgan Stanley (yes, the one who would go on to found Greenhill) who pioneered the M&A industry as a viable business line for banks.

To conclude, one perhaps better thing is that expensing was widespread and it was not uncommon to fly private to a client meeting as an associate (this being said an associate then had VP-like responsibilities)

 

Data rooms were literally rooms of boxes and files. Total mess from what I hear 

 

How about affirmative action and URM programs? How did companies help achieve equity for minorities? 

 

Yea any woman who came up in finance and is 40+ years old I have immense respect for.

You know they earned that shit.

 
Funniest

Analyst classes are now often laced with non target and dei hires   

 

Lol it’s because kids from ivies typically aren’t interested in going into ib - they usually prefer to go to software engineering or science related fields instead 

It’s somewhat seen as unprestigious at some schools to study something complex and join a field that only requires basic arithmetic so people decide to do other more intellectually stimulating jobs instead 

Students from ivy leagues often still get lots of interviews and opportunities when they’re interesting in applying 

 

What were client meetings like? Heard there was more fun stuff potentially but unsure of what that would entail 

 

Nyc sounds like it was a much different city back in the 80s and 90s. Where would analysts typically reside and what was it like for someone in their 20s in the city? I have heard from someone in my analyst class that basically the entire west side, east village, and LES which many people nowadays very much enjoy living in were previously the slums?

 

Is it possible IB could’ve been much more simple back then?

Sounds less likely that people made 50 page pitch books or CIMs… models were hand-drawn? Imagine if people wanted to do an LBO, would they just have to do a paper LBO since there wasn’t excel to do a more in depth one?

How did people spread comps? How would people even know what other companies existed in a specific sector?
 

How would people do precedent transactions if there was no internet to know what transactions occurred in a specific sector? 

 

newspapers, etc. helped stay up-to-date on transactions and I assume there were also some public filings of accounts on big companies. If not, the companies could also keep some accounts from the company's if the approached them in the past for some transactions and just make some assumptions for the years that they don't have the financials. Even for not so public financials, I think that's the idea of having a brokerage arm, you request the financials of some companies to write reports on and advise on buy/sell (clearly all stocks were buy considering that companies made a favor to the bank to hand them their financials). 

but that's the general idea of many businesses back then, they were paid by actual knowledge/information, nowadays, with internet, everybody can build a M&A wit some tutorials with the latest public financials, so IB lost its edge on the information/knowledge side and nowadays it relies more on relationships/network

 

Heavy survivorship bias. The older people you'd come across and ask them this question are the people who made it and thus are the people who'd enjoy the culture. The people who didn't have left or flamed out

 

All nighters at the printer getting fat on milkshakes and good food while you waited for the next draft of the prospectus to page turn, reading S&P tear sheets on every company comp, LOTUS 1-2-3 and not Excel, slow computers with floppy disk drives, documents received/sent physically by mail/fedex, old Bell telephones with an attached speaker box, a library in your building where you spent hours looking through microfiche, using a dial-up modem to transfer files to other offices, black and white decks where you prepared the pages in WordPerfect and printed out charts to be physically cut-and-pasted with scissors and then xeroxed. Smoking in the office all day/night.

But, the office humor was old school and people would really party at the closing dinner. 

 

Surprised no one’s mentioned it but highly recommend reading Monkey Business by John Rolfe and Peter Troob. It’s a little dramatized here and there but I have yet to find a better account of this exact topic at the junior level. Two Ivy League MBAs start as juniors at DLJ in early 90s and they go in detail with how the work actually worked.

 

My favorite part of that book was when the associate was making iterations of a draft. Guy started with v1, sends to VP, who proceeds to ask for various changes, creates v2, sends back, vp asks for more changes, v3, sends to director who makes other edits, v4, then sends to MD who asks the group for other changes, v5

Then v5 ended up looking exactly like v1 lol

 

Just finished the book a minute ago after seeing your comment yesterday morning - great read, thanks for sharing. Would consider it a must read for any monkey tbh

 

Why is office culture so different nowadays compared to back then? I’ve read so many finance books about the tales of people in ib who worked in the 90s back in college, and when I started the job it seemed nothing like what was in the books 

 

Didnt fully exist on an institutional scale earlier on. Old school corporate raiders / barbarian-at-the-gate-types where just small teams, not the megafunds that they are now.

My guess is that exiting IB to work for them was akin to joining a search fund nowadays. It was a risk, not an established path

 

Velit et fuga dolor harum ut ullam. Iure quidem tempore aut nulla ut commodi.

Ut aut est sequi dolor saepe. Aut quae et est natus hic non saepe. Nesciunt quaerat quos voluptates dolorum nam corrupti. Dicta totam enim laboriosam rerum aspernatur. Quasi voluptatem quo odio. Fugiat est beatae neque ea deleniti.

Expedita voluptatibus rem nemo quis quia doloribus ad. Occaecati dolores eum quas et sequi itaque.

Dolore consectetur asperiores aut iusto earum odio sed. Temporibus et sit omnis. Illum quae et eveniet et nulla asperiores doloribus.

 

Autem enim consectetur nesciunt omnis natus veniam. Facere explicabo nam hic incidunt dolor velit pariatur.

Qui tenetur ut a qui omnis nam consequatur blanditiis. Vel quia ipsum quam officiis voluptatem veritatis.

Magni incidunt voluptatem veniam et. Non eaque et delectus aut rerum. Itaque pariatur impedit qui. Qui esse sunt dolor quae odit et est. Exercitationem ut voluptatum sed dolores et expedita maxime libero. Qui hic eaque voluptatem ipsum. Adipisci vel quo vitae dignissimos non et dolor.

 

Libero accusamus ipsa at quia atque. Magnam dolorem asperiores aut ut molestias molestiae aut inventore.

Libero consequatur quae qui animi quam et est. Unde enim et asperiores aut numquam provident omnis. Aut laborum ut nobis qui expedita velit et.

Facere molestiae ducimus necessitatibus possimus aliquid. Cum voluptatem nihil at veritatis et. Explicabo dolores iure voluptates.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”