Reason JP Morgan is not as strong in the GSE space as Wells/Cap One?

Is there a strategic reason JP Morgan is not as active (is it intentional?) in the GSE lending space compared to banks like Wells/Cap One? From the outside looking in, the GSE business can be a takeout source for their in house construction/bridge loans. The business can be profitable with little risk. I know they have a big balance sheet lending group specifically for MF assets that compete with the GSE's. Is this the main reason?

 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not explicitly stated why JP Morgan may not be as active in the GSE lending space compared to banks like Wells Fargo or Capital One. However, it's mentioned that GSEs (Government-Sponsored Enterprises) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play a significant role in the economy, particularly in the housing market. They provide services to an underserved part of the economy and can be a source of capital in crunch times.

However, GSEs also come with their own set of challenges. They can be easy to exploit and their reliance on capital markets can exacerbate market downturns. It's also mentioned that GSEs could potentially undergo reform, but it's unlikely they will ever go back to being private entities.

As for JP Morgan, it's not clear from the context provided why they may not be as active in the GSE space. It could be due to a variety of strategic reasons, risk management considerations, or other factors specific to the bank's operations and objectives.

For a more accurate answer, you might want to reach out to someone who works in the GSE space or at JP Morgan. They could provide more insight into the bank's strategy and operations.

Sources:

  1. Why not GSE lending? Stigmas?
  2. GS Merger Rumors
I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It is a new team for the org. I don't believe there is any balance sheet lending group just focused to MF. There are groups dedicated to affordable though. 

 
Most Helpful

JPM is new to the GSE conventional lending business.  They got in a couple years ago and spent time building their back office.  They are now starting to build out the origination team (which could be attractive to someone frustrated by senior bankers at their company that “own” all the top sponsors).
 

JPM has been a prolific MF middle market lender (portfolio term loans) in select markets (mostly West and East Coasts).  The GSE program will give them term loan programs to expand their offerings across the nation and provide larger loans than available through their legacy MF program.  They can leverage their portfolio to drive business but like most Bank backed GSE lenders, are limited to their own products and unable to clear the market.  Of course, they don’t have an MF investment sales platform to funnel in lending business as has been successfully employed as a strategy by most major GSE groups either.  

The way this market seems headed,  it’s hard to say if these limitations will matter.  We could easily see a market where the GSEs and private capital are the only game in town.  If that’s the case, a fortress bank with a GSE program is a good bet.

 

Non doloribus ab totam quia doloribus sunt qui. Consectetur ex pariatur voluptatem.

Animi ab sint aut. Nihil dolor maiores voluptas aperiam ipsum. Et architecto amet nam. Cupiditate aut deserunt vel aut et. Sed inventore quos quod beatae enim vero tenetur. Expedita incidunt in id omnis magnam minus soluta optio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 19 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (22) $375
  • Associates (93) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”