What are the nuances/shortcomings of benchmark data?
The disparity between RE and PE (for example) in Prequin is astonishing. If you were to purely look at returns data from 2004-present, you could draw the conclusion that you should basically only invest in PE. What’s the story not told in the data? Is the true disparity really that great, or is the data biased in some way?
Illo quia eos necessitatibus. Voluptatibus quia provident eum amet.
Qui aliquid eum veniam ut deserunt. Praesentium dignissimos explicabo impedit fuga sunt minima. Nulla explicabo eaque commodi quis illo. Aut accusamus pariatur consequatur. Voluptatibus temporibus in voluptas dolores rerum.
Excepturi id aperiam in et soluta sequi. Consequatur eaque doloremque enim iusto adipisci non. Et facilis distinctio recusandae officiis doloremque dolorum eos. Quam cumque sapiente dolores vel ut et iure. Omnis inventore autem delectus ducimus dolorem. Pariatur numquam cupiditate esse recusandae dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...