In order for that to happen there has to be a business reason. The role of partner at Goldman is very different than a PM at a fund. Goldman is doing this for retention reasons (from my understanding) due to the competitive landscape in IB comp (and the poaching that is going on). A Goldman partner is not competition to a HF PM (and vice versa), you can’t just leave the HF and take that partner role (or go work in most IB areas) AND many of the PM agreements are very competitive (from a comp perspective) and linked to what matters to them (PnL).

[deleted]

Investment Manager in HF - Other

Most Helpful

Sint iure qui illum excepturi placeat aspernatur. Consequatur laudantium eos nostrum animi sed. Tempora quibusdam pariatur voluptatem.

Enim vel deleniti et ut sed nam hic. Ea hic molestiae doloremque placeat eius asperiores.

Voluptatum magnam cupiditate sed est veniam ad dolores. Reiciendis unde velit magnam recusandae dolor. Qui eum eaque sunt laudantium magnam non minima. Enim quos consequatur voluptatem illum sit vitae.

Quote

Report

Other

Authored by: Certified Hedge Fund Professional - Investment ManagerCertified Hedge Fund Pro

+63	Do you regret going into public markets investing?	HF	31	15h
+37	RIP Jim Simons	HF	28	1d
+23	Advice ahead of a pair trade presentation - HF interview	HF	7	1d
+23	Is Quasi-MNPI The Ultimate Alpha Generator For Public Equities?	HF	8	2d
+23	Why are so many people here interested in Biotech?	HF	29	9h
+23	VP HF Lateral To PE	HF	1	8h
+21	Point 72 let go of seven long-short managers !!	HF	26	1d
+20	College search for getting into HF	HF	19	9h
+18	UPenn SEAS vs Cornell Engineering	HF	8	5d
+18	Drunk Thought: Shouldnt PM's at MM inverse their Portfolio's?	HF	6	14h

1	redever	99.2
2	BankonBanking	99.0
3	Betsy Massar	99.0
4	Secyh62	99.0
5	GameTheory	98.9
6	kanon	98.9
7	dosk17	98.9
8	CompBanker	98.9
9	Kenny_Powers_CFA	98.8
10	Jamoldo	98.8

[deleted]

See All Comments - 100% Free

Trending Content