Sector focus vs generalist

How would you think about the choice between a small-cap generalist vs sector specialist seats at two different shops that are broadly similar in quality? I find the small-cap generalist seat more interesting - the ability to look at different sectors, different business models should, in theory, be great for developing as an investor. However, the advice I have received from more experienced investors thus far has highlighted the career benefits of developing a sector expertise.

Any input would be appreciated!

 

They’re not wrong, focusing on an expertise could help expedite your career whereas starting as a generalist could end up with indecision.

Now if you don’t know where to start and want to explore before deciding on what you like the most, go the generalist route.

 
Most Helpful

The argument for generalist alpha is that you can apply pattern recognition across sectors

The argument for specialist alpha is that you know the companies better than anyone else

I find the latter a lot more persuasive, but idk

 

All the very successful pod shops operate in verticals, i.e. sector specialists. Given the rise of pod shops, that might be a good career move if you are thinking long-term. 

 

While this is the rule, there are exceptions.

I've seen a handful of generalist pods at MMs, its doable if that's what you want.

 

The important note to this in my experience is that most generalist PMs at MMs began as specialists and gradually added additional verticals to their coverage. They tend to be more 2-3 sector specialists than people that look at the entirety of the market.

 

My fund is generalist and has managed good results. What I’ve found is we all tend to gravitate towards some sector bias (someone more oriented towards financials, one on healthcare and TMT, but all moving across sectors as we see fit) so you get some benefit of sector focus while still having flexibility.

I feel that being a generalist has prepared me more to make the eventual step to PM, but definitely have felt disadvantaged in certain sectors/situations where expertise is valuable and takes longer to develop. In those cases I basically have to handicap things more or stay away. Usually the latter.

I have been able to generate solid results as a generalist but probably would have done better with a sector focus. But being a generalist is def more interesting IMO. Markets are so competitive that being sector focused is probably better if you have the team to do it.

 

Neque molestiae reprehenderit qui quia voluptas. Sed magni debitis id ut qui alias. Omnis nisi quae minus quo est voluptatem adipisci magni. Iusto corporis ut ut perferendis corrupti recusandae vel. Est nulla distinctio dolorum reprehenderit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (251) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”