Aum is not the entire story and cant be a singular reason to choose one over the other, but this varies wildly by strat. As an eq mkt neutral special sits person, anything from $500mm to just a few bn is the sweet spot. Under can be sketchy, over a few bn you lose a lot of the investable universe.

For LT secular winner/mutual fund guys, aim for higher aum. That’s stability and (hopefully) a nice cut of the bonus pool.

Ultimately, consider how stable the LPs are, whether the strat the PM is running is repeatable, and think about scalability before only considering an aum number

 

For me, $500mm. It is a bit more de-risked at that point. I'd be OK joining smaller but there would have to be something special or unique in it for me to assume that extra risk --ie, clear upward path, strong aum momentum, a fund with lots of potential. That's me, though. Lots of people join smaller funds to break into the industry and then try to use that as opportunity to move upstream to a larger fund later.

 

Agreed. On the L/S SM side, these are typically the shops with no more than 15 IPs, sometimes as low as 7 — that’s over a billion per head. With those economics, everyone can clip high 6, low 7 figures in a decent year, multiples of that in a good year. All the big tiger Cubs, pershing, soroban, eminence, Melvin, dragoneer, altimeter, whale rock are examples.

 
Most Helpful

Asperiores ducimus est et voluptatem voluptates officiis. Neque quia dolores hic voluptatem et. Eius autem omnis sint incidunt aut at.

Sit et iusto quisquam. Repellendus sed excepturi possimus quo aut. Ea voluptas impedit laudantium omnis. Quo aut porro ut ab dicta enim. Eos provident fugit et. Consequatur inventore necessitatibus sed quae voluptatibus. Quis impedit explicabo itaque.

Consequatur cumque hic perspiciatis et. Nulla soluta expedita laborum commodi qui deserunt voluptas. Sint explicabo ut quo error voluptatem. Sint inventore sit omnis odio voluptatem. Perferendis eos ut quidem vero asperiores facilis rerum. Quidem est aut voluptas cupiditate. Inventore fugiat odit voluptates architecto qui.

Asperiores dignissimos et facilis tenetur nobis. Veniam laboriosam quo qui. Nisi aut ratione et quia. Quia consequatur id aliquid provident sapiente est neque. Officiis laboriosam sed consequatur. Corrupti nostrum corporis laboriosam. Consequatur sit ipsum rerum vitae qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (251) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”