When modeling a three-statement model without explicit initial values for cash and equity, you can approach it by making reasonable assumptions based on typical industry standards or historical data of the company if available. Here’s how you can handle it:

  1. Assuming Initial Cash:

    • Historical Balance Sheets: If previous years' financial statements are available, use the most recent closing cash balance as the starting point.
    • Industry Norms: If no historical data is available, consider typical cash balances held by similar companies in the same industry.
    • Operational Needs: Estimate initial cash needed to support day-to-day operations, considering the company's size and operational cycle.
  2. Assuming Initial Equity:

    • Historical Data: Use the equity value from the most recent balance sheet available. This includes retained earnings and any contributed capital.
    • Startup Scenario: If it’s a new company, the initial equity is often the amount of capital invested by the founders and investors.
    • Adjustments: Adjust the initial equity for any known changes that have occurred since the last balance sheet date, such as new equity injections or dividends paid.
  3. Documentation and Justification:

    • Clearly State Assumptions: When making assumptions, document them clearly in your model. This includes the rationale behind each assumption based on the data or benchmarks used.
    • Sensitivity Analysis: Consider performing a sensitivity analysis to show how changes in these assumptions could impact the financial projections.

By following these steps, you can construct a more informed and realistic three-statement model even when some initial parameters are not directly provided.

Sources: The Three Most Common Technicals, Help with 3-Statement Model Test, REPE Entity level investment, DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/qa-equity-research-analyst-at-top-3-am?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Vitae laudantium minus totam nihil. Aut illo iste et dolores in. Quia ex corporis omnis earum nulla et molestiae.

Eum inventore fugiat veniam dolores quasi blanditiis. Voluptas explicabo odit incidunt libero eum. Sunt quia dolores et et placeat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”