Private credit firm has an unlevered IRR of over 25%. This sounds insanely high to me, however lending does take place in the LMM. The thing that doesn’t make sense to me is this isn’t a mezz fund, mostly 1L and 2L. Is this common, does this make sense?
| +174 | PE Recruiting Prep Guide - 2024 | 21 | 13h | |
| +126 | Vista vs Thoma Bravo | 58 | 21h | |
| +44 | No hispanics in PE | 32 | 28m | |
| +29 | Is Thoma Bravo fucked? | 17 | 1d | |
| +27 | Private Equity in Japan | 10 | 3d | |
| +24 | MS M&A/MC/Menlo vs MF PE Analyst | 27 | 4d | |
| +18 | Down after rejection | 8 | 2d | |
| +15 | How to participate in on-cycle before start date / away from NYC | 7 | 3d | |
| +14 | Sports Teams and Wealth Diversification | 4 | 1d | |
| +12 | Investing in Real Estate while in PE | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Sometimes mezz lenders do smaller deals and take priority/senior positions with mezz-like returns. Maybe they hit a home run on some equity sweeteners too that they packed into a small deal that blew up (in a good way)?
That could be an explanation, however the number of deals in this average irr makes me skeptical. On a side note, what ways could a firm like this exit warrant positions besides a change of control like an LBO?
When you say “firm”, do you mean across all its funds since inception? I would guess you mean only one fund that is probably freshly raised (last couple months) and found one or two quick secondary deals. To know whether a 25% unlevered [probably gross] irr is truly impressive, we would have to know how long the track record is and the MOIC.
Yes, over multiple funds and correct, irr is gross. I think there are secondaries. Would secondaries increase irr because you are getting in at a discount?
I mean you can call it 1L but in the LMM, there typically isn't room for more than one lender to begin with so 1L can quickly become mezz like risk. I'm assuming this is more opportunistic credit with warrants attached.
You sure that 25% is real though? That's high for any credit strategy. Have these positions been held a few years, or did they just underwrite a bunch of deals, mark up the warrants, and call it a 25% IRR?
Does it become similar to mezz risk in LMM because of lack of asset coverage? How would marking up warrants work? (Basing value on current "market value" of the portco?)
It's similar risk because like you hinted at, it's mostly based on cash flow/growth as opposed to pure hard assets.
Not sure how small these companies are but for example, if leveraging a company with $1.5MM EBITDA is completely feasible for them to 10x in 3 - 5 years?
But I think a post above mentioned this was @ each investment instead of being driven by one deal going bananas...
Valuation methodologies depend on firm a bit. If it's a good firm, they won't mark up their warrants quickly and will deduct the initial estimated value from the entry basis of the debt position, accruing that initial estimated value over the term of the debt position.
I really have no idea what this company is doing though, so I could be dead wrong. I'm just fairly skeptical of any debt IRR > 20%.
Hey, DM me. I think I know the firm you’re talking about and know why they’re able to underwrite senior loans to a 1.5x+ MOIC and 25%+ IRR.
1.5 moic with 25 unlevered? are these sponsors repaying early? why are they able to exit within 2 yrs?
Quae quos doloremque nam. Deserunt qui illum voluptatum blanditiis optio dolorem id sint. Possimus non ut quasi soluta. Non et aut eius voluptatem. Impedit molestias et aut cumque quas.
Reiciendis blanditiis architecto enim fugiat. Eius unde ut autem quasi dolorem beatae et. Natus aut nostrum architecto libero fugiat provident. Velit ut itaque placeat sapiente.
Vel tenetur cumque qui quibusdam ipsum illo. Et sit sint nemo. Est iure ea error placeat velit odit voluptates modi.
Facere debitis repellendus eos odio accusantium. Velit architecto rerum repellendus cumque voluptas autem. Voluptatum dolores occaecati soluta nostrum. Reiciendis optio voluptates itaque nulla nihil nulla. Consequatur odio sed et repellat sit est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...