I have been seeing a lot of negative news surrounding their name recently. Does anyone have any insight on some of their properties and what their future looks like? The overall short position on their stock is relatively high, beyond macro things like interest rates, is there any justification for this?
| +67 | Hiring Analyst/Associate - Advice | 31 | 5h | |
| +40 | Current CRE Phase | 19 | 2d | |
| +36 | Laid Off - Multifamily Acquisitions Help | 8 | 22h | |
| +26 | Best Brokerages in South Florida | 18 | 18h | |
| +26 | Capital Formation | 9 | 3d | |
| +25 | PART 2: Increasing RE Industry's Cash Compensation, Collectively | 1 | 4d | |
| +24 | URGENT - a list of Halal/Islamic real estate funds and investment companies for potential applications | 9 | 4h | |
| How many days a week are you expected to be in the office? | 23 | 3s | ||
| +23 | NYU MSRE Program | 7 | 2d | |
| +22 | UK Development | 4 | 10h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Well their stock was over valued as were many companies in Real Estate prior to Rate hikes, those coincided with the brokered business news and I believe their SBL had some decent exposure to it not just their larger MF portfolio. So news on news and then they did a decent amount of the Agency lending, which is one of the brokered businesses that was crushed. So it all came together. I heard Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are making lenders that did some of these deals from different brokers, buy those loans back. It's a mess. But Arbor is big they'll come out on the other end at some point, just negative news stacking on top of more negative news, on top of poor economy, and add in bad press, creates what you have now.
There are prominent names such as Viceroy who are shorting the stock: https://viceroyresearch.org/arbor-realty-research/
I don't believe that much of this has to do with their Agency DUS operations. Per conversations with DUS shops, brokered business ultimately wasn't significantly hampered. The largest change was the flow of information processes whereby borrowers had to submit DD directly into the DUS shop's upload portal and no information coming from the brokerage would be accepted. Although I'm sure in some markets where fraud was prevalent, volumes might be impaired I suppose.
The biggest issue with their stock is their CLO operations. Basically their MREIT is heavily leveraged into bridge loans that they've originated. If those loans were to ever default, losses could be huge for Arbor. Given that many of these loans were originated in 2020 and 2021 where stabilized debt yields into the 6s were commonplace, there are virtually no takeout options for these loans in the present environment and there is virtually no way that they are debt servicing (given current rates in the 8s). The only solution for arbor to liquidate their assets is to either sell them on the marketplace for a discount which could wipe out a large chunk of their equity since they're so heavily leveraged via their CLOs or to force borrowers to either paydown the loan or sell the property. Either way, they are one big shock away from bankruptcy and are only buoyed by the fact that cap rates haven't pushed into the 6s yet on the vast majority of the assets that they have loans on. But if there is an exogenous shock that prevents many of their borrowers from hitting their proformas, there is very little margin for Arbor.
Is NYMT fucked? I own their stock lol.
We'll see how things shake out given ~$11BB of multifamily is due this year before extension options, and their last dollar LTV is creeping. If you dig into their financials, they jumped up from $7.7MM non-accrual to $274MM year over year.
I think Ladder Capital (comparable company but no GSE business) is pretty cheap right now. Less than 1% of their portfolio is non-accrual. And when they've taken keys back in the past, they've done a good job.
April CLO data at Arbor looks really ugly. At least 200MM in additional credit problems just month on month,
where can i see this?
Should be seeing a viceroy report any day now.
The new viceroy report is out for April. What is going to force these companies to properly value their books? I have talked to several lenders lately and they are capitalizing interest. On paper this looks great, but in reality it is creating bigger losses for their investors. It seems like the market is playing dumb but this is a major problem. It doesn’t look like anyone is accountable to the investors.
For as long as the underlying CLO investors and/or warehouse lenders allow it. Likely until the full loan terms, including extensions, run out.
So word on the street is that Arbor is supporting its loans that cannot service the debt with preferred equity injections into underwater properties.
Have people seen this happening?
Are other CLOs and debt funds doing the same thing.
If true this would massively manipulate earnings in the short run but in the long run be terrible for its investors and bond holders.
They have raised preferred equity for a long time so it wouldn't be surprising. At the end of the day, it's still the sponsors that are placing preferred equity on their deals, no? And if you're a CLO investor, I'm not sure how this would be terrible for your position.
They are using arbor’s shareholder and bond holder money to put preferred equity on underwater deals, so those deals look like they are performing.
The sponsors are wiped out and I assume that arbor is dictating terms to them. This isn’t outside money that sponsors are obtaining. This is arbor paying the loans for the sponsors.
Issuing new investments that are worthless is bad for shareholders. It disguises the trouble of the loans. It uses good money to pay bad debt. It also creates taxable net income from investment reserves. This is essentially a shell game that wastes money. It is compounding the problems and losses they are facing.
Wasting shareholder and bond holder money and disgusting problems is bad for the shareholders and bond holders.
Arbor’s management is supposed to act in the best interest of their shareholders and creditors. It is not supposed to make bad preferred equity investments to the hide problems of their bad loans.
Ahhh I see. Yes, in that case, seems like some manipulation.
If I play it out from their likely line of reasoning, they are in first loss position on the CLOs anyways so either way, shareholders are on the hook. By using balance sheet preferred equity, they are likely creating an easier foreclosure process and not blowing up the CLO markets and their warehouse lines (yet).
Not saying it’s the right thing to do, just playing devil’s advocate.
It just creates greater losses for Arbor shareholders and misleads the market.
AllThingsMulti nailed it. It's all about incentives.
Also consider Arbor has been the focus of many shorts, with over 40% of the float shorted. To give that number some context, even a shitco like Carvana only has 32% of their float shorted. So the struggles with the company are well known.
By manipulating their KPIs and doubling down on bad deals, they're maintaining their earnings on paper and maintaining a dividend. Both of these increase the carrying costs for short interest owners which causes pain on that end of the capital stack.
It may not be the boy scout thing to do - but it's what management is incentivized to do. They made horrible decisions at peak cycle and instead of cutting bait early on those loans they've decided to double down and hope it all works out in the end. They committed themselves to this path years ago and there's no real turning back.
It what it is.
Do you have a source for this?
I listened to their 1Q24 call last night and thought it was strange that their avg. borrower contribution on their >$1B 1Q extensions was ~ 2.5% of UPB, which they clearly stated was used to buy replacement IR caps. I thought it was strange that (a) they were advertising a majority success rate in getting borrowers to bring these funds to the table, with no context on where those funds were coming from & (b) that there was almost zero principal paydowns.
You made the latest viceroy report. Congrats.
I heard it from two independent sources that are well respected. I also heard another large CLO is doing the same thing. I imagine a bunch of them are doing it.
I also saw on the TREPP data on deals I know have 0 money and negative DSCR go current this past month when they have been delinquent for months.
& There you have it. Found the $45M of new capital.
Is that roughly $60m in preferred equity? If so, that is greater than their entire Q1 Net Income. I don't generally read quarterly reports, so maybe i am not reading it correctly. I suspect we will see it explode in Q2.
It will be interesting to see if Ready Cap is doing the same thing when they release their fincials later this week.
I'm just tying back to the statement at 4:00 that the CEO made in the link below. I wouldn't be surprised if the $45.129M in Mezz/Pref originations is the "roughly $45M in fresh capital" that these borrowers "brought to the table".
Doing pref or even a capital call on some of these deals is beyond crazy.
If you are trying to disguise distress in your portfolio that is something else.
Do the stock analysts not pick up on this? It is crazy that every stock analyst hasn’t put the stock as a “sell”.
Ready Cap just reported a large loss for Q1
The new ViceCroy report is claiming fraud. Does Vicecroy hate them, or is it really just that shady? I've seen similar things done to help reposition losses to look better for reporting standards. Is it really fraud?
Arbor is clearly trying to hide the reality of it book from investors and is actively misleading the market. I don’t know the legal definition of fraud, but I feel bad for their investors and creditors.
I hate Arbor as much as the next person and think they are shady. Are they doing more than other MF shops and lenders or just normal acts of business during tough times that others are doing as well to offset losses and distressed assets? I feel most are trying to cover their poor AM and free going credit process during the period of free money.
Why aren’t their lenders calling in their warehouse lines?
The longer they wait to secure their investment, the bigger their losses will be.
Do we know how many loans arbor has had to buy back from the agencies? Their “underwriting” is terrible.
Use to work in screening deals at a lender that does Freddie & Fannie. Saw tons of sh*t deals come in (think Meridian type deals from Sponsors who they claim to be richer than g*d). If we didn’t come to meridian’s terms, it was a classic “if you don’t get us those terms, Arbor will.”
We decided not to move forward with a bunch and sure enough, fast forward 1-2 months, they got the loan through Arbor at those outrageous terms. To be fair, who knows if the same rent roll and T12 are being sent to Arbor, or if they got a different set of statements to “make the numbers work.”
Either way, there is at least 1 deal I know of where a 2nd year analyst in UW could see the sponsor and statements were full of sh*t, but sure enough, it got financed through Fannie with Arbor. Seems like business rationale always > credit rationale. Oddly enough, even though Fannie is risk-share to the lender, it’s easier to get a loan approved than Freddie since you only have to convince internal loan committee, versus having to deal with Freddie’s approves at well.
Freddie & Fannie recently updated their DD and inspection guidelines to be stricter to combat fraud, but what they could implement, to take it one step further, is to require each lender to upload the screening DD sent in by the Sponsor (rent roll, T12) into Freddie and Fannie’s respective quote platform (where the deals get logged).
It’s widely known that brokers and sponsors send out the deal to multiple lenders to see who can get the best deal and terms - requiring the lender at screening to upload these would mitigate “different” statements being sent to different lenders for the same deal.
There are a few agency lenders who always scrape the bottom of the barrel for both sponsor and/or asset quality over the years. Some of us keep waiting for the agencies (including HUD) to wake up to it. I read the Viceroy report today and find it fascinating. Nothing in there surprises me. During the GFC, I met a sponsor who had an Arbor bridge loan in Michigan. It was restructured, Arbor pref equity/mezz (I do not remember which) injected into the property, and then refinanced with HUD as rates fell. Not a bad way for Arbor to get paid. I didn't even realize at the time HUD and pre-equity could coexist but I'm sure it was disguised. Maybe they are the reason Fannie/Freddie are issuing updates about asset quality and enhanced borrower DD!
Alias eius aut natus et. Modi iste maxime commodi. Sit accusamus doloremque qui harum rerum. Voluptatibus sed tenetur velit ipsum.
Cum ut quisquam blanditiis ipsa esse consequuntur. Ducimus ab possimus doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Animi odit sequi sit ut. Repellendus voluptas ex commodi. Sed id omnis id dolore.
Vero veniam eius omnis non. Debitis voluptatem voluptatem quaerat soluta nulla autem aut. Perspiciatis nam eveniet cumque et.
Necessitatibus in dolores voluptatum quis nulla. Perspiciatis vel nostrum vitae in architecto quod. Nesciunt sequi voluptatem fuga quaerat minus aut. Tenetur vel temporibus libero magnam autem.
Ea beatae non natus libero ut autem sequi. Blanditiis quia vel eos quasi quod iste numquam officiis. Cumque quod aut praesentium qui ipsum blanditiis. Facilis veniam voluptatem quibusdam voluptatem quam ut. Reprehenderit delectus est voluptates consequatur ducimus id. Nemo voluptatem quia harum quia occaecati rerum ea praesentium. Hic praesentium omnis modi velit velit.