Why don't they make an exotic product prop shop?

I know this question is really dumb, but I'm curious. Why don't they have proprietary trading firms to trade exotic products? By structured products, I mean structured credit products (CDOs, CLOs,CMOs, and other ABS), energy derivatives (swaps, forwards, linked notes, etc), and interest rate derivatives (I know this isn't structured) like(swaptions,Turbos, Snowballs, etc). I know that liquidity is a major issue in trading exotic derivs like the ones mentioned. Intellect is an issue as trading exotics requires more 'skill' than equities. What else do you think prevents a exotic product prop shop?

 

Just about all of these products are traded OTC, so there is less transparency, less liquidity as you mentioned, and I could be wrong about this part, but I think a lot of these products are still traded over the phone. Since most of these firms have a competitive advantage in technology, they would lose this edge if they moved into the exotic space. That being said, a part of the OTC market is starting to be captured by exchanges, especially CME, so it is possible that once CME makes more ground, you could see some firms start to move into the exotic space, this last part is just an educated guess though.

 

very insightful view by above poster. i work closely the dcm and agree with just about all points regarding derivs except that i don't see many players entering the exotic space in the near future given the market climate associated with the structured vehicles that started this mess in the markets. it's stupid really, but the fact of the matter is risk management won't see expansion into anything related in the short term.

 
Best Response

You also need to keep in mind who is the market for structured products. Some exotic products, like a commodities basket option or a principal-protected note on a basket option, for example, are usually geared towards investors, who are buying and holding (real money investors, for example).

Other products are bespoke hedging solutions geared toward someone with an underlying exposure (so in commodities it would be a corporation like P&G or Southwest), but again, someone who is also looking to buy and hold. For corporates the hedging solutions are so structured that they would be of no use to anyone but the intended client. As a result, there's really not much in the way of secondary trading of most structured products. Hence, few people actually "trade" them.

That's why at banks the sales people and structurers are the ones who are most active in structured products, whereas the traders are usually just hedging out the risk involved in structuring and selling structured products to clients.

 

Very interesting views.. The whole thing about losing the tech edge is pretty interesting. So when do you think that exchanges will start incoporating OverTheCounter derivs into their operations?

http://www.afr0jacks.com/ Afro Jacks

 

Sapiente voluptatum et quia praesentium. Exercitationem libero est nulla optio consequatur aperiam voluptatem quod. Recusandae ipsam ad nulla commodi et deserunt quasi. Blanditiis dolore quas eveniet assumenda. Voluptate maxime consequuntur sed excepturi sunt.

Ad nihil eos inventore dolore et. Excepturi accusamus ducimus quis fugit ducimus. Exercitationem sed doloribus in id.

Nobis natus voluptate eligendi consequatur blanditiis. Voluptatem et officiis maiores delectus explicabo aut est perspiciatis. Labore laudantium provident explicabo porro. Et eum sapiente aut dolorem sint. In consequuntur sit repellendus architecto.

Asperiores debitis labore provident unde. Accusantium impedit qui et autem qui nihil. Id quasi incidunt eligendi dicta voluptatibus tempora. Blanditiis eos ea unde ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”