The Curious Interest of Venture Capitalist in the Demise of Startups

Hello fellow Redditors,

I've been doing a bit of research into the world of venture capital lately and came across an intriguing topic that I think could generate some discussion here. It turns out that venture capitalists sometimes take an interest in startup failures, and I'm interested in hearing your opinion on this phenomenon.

Venture capitalists are often associated with investing in promising startups and promoting them. But there are cases where venture capitalists seem to be interested in the potential failure of some startups. At first glance, this may seem illogical, but the reasons for this may be different.

Of course, this does not mean that all venture capitalists actively seek the failure of startups. Many venture capitalists genuinely want the startups they invest in to succeed and turn a profit. But it's worth recognizing that the dynamics between venture capitalists and startups can be complex and multifaceted.

What are your thoughts on this? Have you come across examples or stories of venture capitalists breaking up startups? Let's discuss and explore different perspectives on this intriguing aspect of startups.

 

Indeed, the relationship between venture capitalists and startups is complex and multifaceted. While it may seem counterintuitive, there are reasons why venture capitalists might be interested in startup failures.

Firstly, failure is a part of the startup ecosystem. It's estimated that 90% of startups fail, and venture capitalists are well aware of this. They understand that not every investment will yield a return, and sometimes, they can learn valuable lessons from these failures.

Secondly, venture capitalists often invest in startups to gain knowledge and experience in a particular industry or technology. Even if a startup fails, the venture capitalist may gain valuable insights that can be applied to future investments.

Lastly, venture capitalists may look at startup failures as a way to identify and invest in talented individuals. A founder who has experienced failure may have learned valuable lessons that make them a more attractive investment in the future.

In my experience, venture capitalists don't actively seek the failure of startups. However, they understand that failure is a part of the process and can provide valuable lessons and opportunities.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I´m really interested in this as I´m a marketer. I´m doing an internship at an analytics company. I´m writing articles on the venture capital industry. And I would like to know more information on this question. My question is - What strategies can be used by venture capitalists to maximize the benefits from failed investments?

 

This reads like RedditGPT wrote this question...

But if I seriously answer it, from my experience across early and late stage VC, the main reason a GP would want one of their ventures to fail is either (1) they want a high risk venture to fail fast (i.e. not turn into a zombie company that wants more capital but doesn't quite grow), or (2) to shutdown and return the capital (because they are overcapitalized but their main business has not worked out, so the investors want their money back).

Hootie
 

Thank you very much for your reply ! I have one more question, if you can answer it, it would be appreciated. I am just starting to learn everything in the venture world and this would be an extremely useful info for me. 
Is it ever the case that venture capitalists intentionally sabotage or accelerate the failure of their portfolio companies in order to manage their own risk and return capital to investors? If so, how common is this practice and what ethical considerations should be taken into account when making such decisions in the venture capital world? 

 
Most Helpful

A rerum maxime facilis est. Similique eaque totam placeat qui quas.

Officiis veritatis rerum ipsum libero consequatur. Sint et velit iusto error.

Ut aliquam qui quia. Deleniti omnis reprehenderit quo sapiente. Molestiae sit animi quis voluptatem.

Hootie

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 04 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”